I’ve worked with compensation plans in every form, from spreadsheets built in a rush to full-blown frameworks signed off by the board. Some work. Some fall short.
And with pay expectations, inflation, regulation and working practices all shifting at speed, getting compensation planning right isn’t optional, it’s business-critical.
In this guide, I’ll show you how to do it properly.
Compensation planning is the process of designing and managing how you pay your people, including salary, bonuses, employee benefits and incentives. It helps ensure pay decisions are fair, competitive and aligned with business goals.
At its best, it aligns your reward strategy with your business strategy, market realities and employee expectations. At its worst, it’s a spreadsheet full of guesswork that erodes trust and burns company budget.
Most companies think compensation means salary. But in reality, it covers everything you offer in return for someone’s time, skills and effort. If you’re only focused on base pay, you’re missing half the picture.
Here’s how the different types of compensation typically break down:
This is the core of most compensation packages: the money employees see on their payslips.
Indirect compensation covers everything outside of take-home pay: the extras that often make or break a compensation package.
These are longer-range tools, typically used to align employees with business performance over time.
The right mix of different types of compensation will depend on your industry, budget and the roles you’re hiring for. But across every organisation I’ve worked with, one thing is clear: Total compensation is what matters, but too many employers focus only on base salary and forget everything else that makes a role competitive.
Companies often neglect to communicate or even recognise the full value of their total compensation offering, which undermines their strategy.
Most companies treat compensation like a budget line until it starts costing them people. In reality, a strong compensation plan is one of the most effective tools HR has to attract and retain top talent, close gaps, and keep decision-makers aligned.
Here’s what it gets you:
If you’re constantly reacting to counter-offers or exit interviews, something’s broken. A thorough compensation plan gives you a clear, data-backed view of what the market’s doing, so you’re not making pay decisions in panic mode, and you’re keeping employees motivated.
Most HR teams I speak to want fair pay – they just don’t have the visibility. Compensation planning gives you a structured way to spot internal inequity and deal with it. Quiet fixes today stop louder problems later.
Too many businesses hand out bonuses and raises with no connection to performance or progression. A good compensation plan forces clarity:
People don’t need every figure on a spreadsheet. But they do want to know that decisions are fair, thought-through and not just based on who shouted loudest. Compensation planning brings consistency and with it credibility.
Every HR team has been in a room where pay decisions get political, emotional or rushed. A well-built compensation plan changes the tone. You come in with a structure. You’ve got benchmarks. And you can push back when needed.
See our guide on conducting pay reviews here.
Every organisation handles pay, but not every organisation has a compensation plan. Without structure, employee compensation can rely heavily on reactive decision-making. That’s when you start seeing inflated offers, internal pay drift and managers pushing for one-off exceptions.
A good compensation plan gives you a system – one that’s consistent, explainable and built to flex with change.
Here’s what that process should look like.
Start by deciding what you believe about pay. Ask yourself:
Without clear principles, you’ll end up making inconsistent decisions, and inconsistencies create confusion and dissatisfaction.
Before you begin salary benchmarking, get a solid understanding of the roles you’re evaluating. Ask yourself:
Once you’ve done the groundwork internally, bring in live market data to do thorough market research. Traditional salary surveys can be useful, but they often fall short in fast-moving markets. Benchmarking against current job ads using salary benchmarking tools like HR Datahub helps you stay aligned with real-time expectations.
With job data and market insight in hand, you can start shaping your salary bands and bonus ranges. Keep it simple: enough structure to guide decisions, but not so rigid that it becomes unusable.
The goal is to help line managers make consistent, defensible decisions. Without this, you can end up with two people doing the same role, on completely different pay, with no rationale behind it.
Benchmarking against live salary data gives you an easy way to set clear expectations for pay by role, skill, location or level without drowning in spreadsheets. And importantly, it will be market-aligned.
Incentives should reflect what you want people to focus on, not just what’s easy to measure. For some roles, such as sales, that’s clear targets, such as hitting sales targets or sales quotas. For others, it’s long-term outcomes or team performance.
Think carefully about how bonuses and variable pay align with behaviour. The best incentive schemes reinforce the company’s goals. The worst ones reward employees for the wrong things entirely.
Watch our free on-demand webinar to learn how to craft effective incentive programs.
Not all value sits in the payslip. Things like pensions, private health insurance, wellbeing budgets, flexibility and development opportunities often matter just as much, and sometimes more.
Rather than copying what others offer, focus on what your people actually care about. A competitive compensation package is only competitive if it reflects the needs of your workforce.
If your managers can’t explain the compensation plan, it won’t land. You don’t need to share every detail, but you do need to be clear about:
When employees understand the process, even tough decisions make more sense.
No compensation plan stays relevant forever. Markets shift. Roles evolve. Expectations change.
Review your compensation plan regularly, at least annually, and ideally more often during periods of change. Use feedback from managers and employees to improve it, and be ready to adjust if something’s no longer working. A good compensation plan should be stable, but never static.
Even the best-designed compensation plans run into problems. Most of the challenges I see come down to one of three things:
Here’s where things often go wrong, and how to get ahead of them.
Too many teams are still making pay decisions based on data that’s six months out of date or worse, based on last year’s assumptions. By the time traditional salary surveys are published, the market has already moved. That kind of lag leads to missed expectations, over- or under-paying and pay decisions that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
Solution: Use live, real-time benchmarking data that reflects what’s happening in the market today. With HR Datahub, you can benchmark roles instantly, filter by location or skill and make quick, precise decisions.
One of the fastest ways to erode trust is to have people doing similar jobs on very different pay. It happens gradually, usually down to rushed hires, retention offers and legacy compensation packages, but over time, it builds resentment. And once people start talking, it’s hard to recover.
Solution: Build regular internal equity reviews into your compensation planning cycle. Don’t wait for problems to surface – use your compensation data to proactively spot gaps and address them. This includes understanding how gender pay gaps are calculated and ensuring your compensation planning actively works to mitigate these disparities.
Leaders want to attract and retain top performers. Employees want meaningful increases. Finance wants to control spend. HR professionals often end up stuck in the middle. Without a clear compensation framework, these conversations become reactive, political and emotionally charged.
Solution: Compensation planning gives you structure, and structure gives you leverage. With the right data, you can back up recommendations, manage expectations and make decisions that hold up to pressure from every direction.
In some organisations, compensation planning floats between HR, Finance and individual business units, which means nobody really owns it. That leads to inconsistent decisions, slow response times and missed opportunities to act strategically.
Solution: Appoint someone to lead the process, even if it's a small team. Clear ownership means clear accountability, and it keeps your compensation plan moving forward instead of falling into the gaps.
These challenges aren’t new, but they are becoming more visible. As pay becomes more transparent and employees get more informed, the cost of inaction rises. The good news? With the right tools and a bit of planning, most of these problems are fixable.
It’s important to be intentional with your strategy. Ask yourself:
A strong strategy connects the dots between business objectives, employee needs and market realities.
Here’s how to build one from the ground up, even if you’re starting from scratch.
Start by asking: What’s the real goal here?
Your strategy should directly support the business’s priorities, whether that’s:
Make your objectives clear. For example:
This gives your compensation work focus and a way to measure progress.
Document where you stand on key questions:
Keep it simple. One page is enough.
Share it with senior leadership and test for alignment early. If they don’t back the compensation philosophy now, they’ll challenge the strategy later.
Before you set pay levels, you need to know where you stand. Use live salary benchmarking tools (like HR Datahub) to:
You don’t need to benchmark every role at once. Start with critical roles or where attrition is highest, then expand from there. Capture your findings in a short internal doc – it’ll inform the structure you build next.
See our guide to salary benchmarking here.
Turn market data into something usable:
This is where most compensation plans fall down, because they’re either too rigid to use or too vague to enforce. Your structure should help managers make informed decisions without needing a spreadsheet and a prayer.
Run a pay equity analysis across similar roles and levels. Look for:
Prioritise fixes. You won’t solve everything at once, but you’ll be able to show progress and make the case for further budget where needed.
A comprehensive analysis should also include diversity data to ensure your compensation structure is free from unintended bias and supports your organisation's inclusion goals.
Map out how existing employees can grow into new pay levels:
This gives employees clarity and managers something solid to base conversations on.
Gut-check your draft strategy:
A compensation strategy can be technically sound and still fall flat if it clashes with how your organisation actually works. If you’re rewarding individual performance in a team-first company culture or pushing transparency in a company that’s never talked about pay, expect pushback. Better to catch that now than during rollout.
This isn’t a one-off project. Your strategy should evolve, but with these steps in place, you’ll have a working model that holds together under pressure, earns leadership buy-in and gives HR teams the confidence to make consistent, fair and competitive pay decisions.
Implementation is where strategy meets reality, where HR teams need to bring together data, comms, and decision-making under pressure.
Here’s how to roll out a compensation plan that people actually use and trust.
Before you launch anything, test your compensation plan with a small group, ideally a mix of HR, line managers and business leaders.
Aim to understand:
Use their feedback to refine the language, tighten any grey areas and sense-check the rollout plan. The earlier you do this, the fewer issues you’ll face later.
Start small. Choose a function, business unit or geography where you can test your compensation plan in practice.
Monitor how well the structure holds up:
This gives you a chance to iron out friction before scaling. And it builds credibility when you go wider, as you’ll be seen as rolling out something tested, not theoretical.
A compensation plan is only as strong as the comms around it. Focus on three things:
You don’t need a full change campaign. But you do need to be intentional and proactive. If you don’t explain it, people will fill in the gaps.
Once the compensation plan is live, it’s not finished; it’s running. And like any business system, it needs monitoring.
Set up regular check-ins to look at:
Use this intel to make improvements. A compensation plan that adapts beats a perfect one that breaks under pressure.
Too often, comp plans get shelved between review cycles. Don’t let that happen.
We’ve built a free Reward Toolkit to help you do exactly that. Whether you're reviewing salary bands, fixing pay drift or rethinking employee benefits, the toolkit gives you templates, checklists and practical guidance to take your compensation plan from theory to execution.
Compensation used to be fairly predictable – annual reviews, rigid salary bands and broad market surveys. Not anymore. Pay is now one of the fastest-moving parts of HR, and teams that treat it like a once-a-year admin task are falling behind.
Here are the trends shaping compensation planning in 2025 and what they mean in practice.
Buffer has published its full salary formula in the open, including how roles, location and experience affect pay. Employees and candidates alike can see exactly how compensation is structured and where they stand.
What to take from it:
You don’t necessarily need to publish your salaries to the world (although you may need to, read more about EU Pay Transparency here). But building a formula-based approach, with clear levers and consistent logic, takes emotion out of pay decisions and builds internal trust. Transparency isn’t all-or-nothing, start by giving managers better tools to explain comp decisions.
Language app company Ling is using AI to offer employees a benefits experience tailored to their preferences, recommending benefits based on needs, habits and values. That means someone focused on family might see childcare perks up front, while others might lean into wellness benefits or travel.
What to take from it:
Customisation doesn’t always require more budget, just smarter targeting. Even small organisations can run annual benefits surveys or use data from existing platforms to offer perks that actually land. Personalised benefits signal that you’re paying attention, not just paying out.
Some McDonald’s franchisees have introduced earned wage access (EWA), letting staff withdraw a portion of their earnings before payday. It’s been positioned as both a financial wellbeing initiative and an employee retention tool, especially in competitive hiring environments.
What to take from it:
For high-churn, hourly or frontline roles, EWA offers flexibility that can outcompete a £0.50/hr raise. If you’re struggling to attract or retain hourly staff, offering faster access to wages might do more than a traditional bonus scheme.
Danone links a portion of its company executives' pay to its climate transition targets, including emissions reduction, sustainable sourcing and energy use. These targets are part of its broader business goals and publicly reported annually.
What to take from it:
If ESG is part of your business strategy, it should be reflected in how people are rewarded. Even modest links, such as team bonuses tied to sustainability or DEI progress, send a clear internal signal. Comp is one of the strongest levers for aligning action with company values.
Microsoft moved away from traditional annual performance reviews and numeric rankings. Instead, they now run a continuous feedback model, encouraging regular check-ins, coaching-style conversations and a focus on growth mindset rather than judgement.
Managers are asked to evaluate both results and behaviours, rewarding collaboration, curiosity and impact over time.
What to take from it:
Performance and compensation are deeply linked, and so is trust. If your reviews feel transactional or outdated, look at ways to build in more regular, human conversations. Even simple quarterly check-ins can surface issues early, guide development and lead to fairer pay decisions down the line.
Read our 2025 pay trends article to dive even deeper into the trends we’re seeing.
At least once a year, but for fast-moving roles or volatile markets, twice. Pay data gets stale quickly. Reviewing more often means fewer retention surprises and better alignment with what the market’s actually doing. Build review checkpoints into your HR calendar, not just around performance cycles.
Most issues I see come down to two things: poor visibility and inconsistent decision-making. Fix those first, and the rest follows.
Prioritise. You can’t do everything, but you can protect pay for critical or hard-to-replace roles. Use market data to guide where to invest, and be transparent about trade-offs. Sometimes clarity matters more than cash.
HR Datahub gives you live salary benchmarking by role, location and level – no spreadsheets, no delays, no guesswork. It’s the fastest way to build a compensation strategy that reflects what’s happening today. If you’re ready to make pay decisions with confidence, get in touch or explore the platform’s features.